BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Edgar v Carnegie of Balnamoon. [1694] 4 Brn 211 (13 November 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040211-0476.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Edgar
v.
Carnegie of Balnamoon
13 November 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In Edgar's improbation, against Carnegie of Balnamoon, they found the maxim, Nunquam concluditur in causa falsi, was in favours of the defender, and not the pursuer; and that, having abidden simply by the writ, he needed not condescend quo modo he came by it. And they refused to reexamine the witnesses who had already deponed; but permitted him to adduce such as had not been already examined, providing it did not hinder the advising of the cause.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting