BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Scot of Benholm v Couts, Ferrier, &c. [1694] 4 Brn 223 (11 December 1694)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040223-0505.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1694] 4 Brn 223      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.

James Scot of Benholm
v.
Couts, Ferrier, &c

Date: 11 December 1694

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

James Scot of Benholm, against Couts, Ferrier, and other merchants in Montrose, anent a bargain of victual. The price of the boll of bear in the contract was £5: 3: 4 Scots, but with this quality, that, being to be transported to Holland before the 1st of April, if they got more than £21 Flemish for the last of it, then he was to get 10s. Scots more on the boll; and, if the market fell low, so as they got less, he was to suffer the like abatement: ita est it never arrived, but the ship was cast away, (though the merchants had insured the cargo;) so they suspended, and craved an ease; for they passed from the first reason, that the victual should perish to him, and be on his risk; for the Lords found the merchants were proprietors of it. As to the defalcation, they answered,—That it was not provided for by the contract; seeing the case there mentioned was the arrival of the ship, which never existed. Yet the Lords thought this fortuitous event included therein; for it were an odd thing to give them abatement as the markets ruled, if the ship had arrived, and to give them none if it perished; especially seeing it bore “wind and weather serving and that Benholm, the charger, by a letter, seemed to undertake the hazard. Therefore the Lords directed a commission to Holland, to try what was the greatest price Scots bear then gave, that his might be regulated thereby, either as to augmentation or diminution.

Vol. I. Page 649.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040223-0505.html