BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Wallace v The Viscount of Kingston, and His Tenants. [1694] Mor 6767 (30 November 1694)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Mor1606767-196.html
Cite as: [1694] Mor 6767

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1694] Mor 6767      

Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. IX.

Abiding by.

Wallace
v.
The Viscount of Kingston, and His Tenants

Date: 30 November 1694
Case No. No 196.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It came to be debated, how far he was bound to abide at the verity of the intimation made to the tenants, which was offered to be improved as false, and which he was content to abide at as truly delivered to him by Mr Robert Swinton the notary, who was content to enact himself to abide by it simpliciter; in regard the Lords had varied in this, sometimes allowing a qualified abiding to heirs who found it in their predecessor's charter chest, and to assignees, that it was really so delivered to them by the cedent; at other times obliging them to abide at it without any quality, in regard of the danger of the preparative, that one, to shun the hazard, will assign it to a person of no fame nor substance;. therefore they took here a middle course, seeing the notary abode at it simpliciter, (as messengers do at executions) and superseded to declare how far he should be liable for using it till the probation were taken, that it may appear how far he was accessory thereto. See the like in Durie, 5th February 1635, Ker, No 173. p. 6750.; and Stair, lib. 4. tit. 20. § 19. Some thought it securer to oblige all to abide simply, but to allow them to protest to be heard at the advising, why they could not be liable.

Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 646.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Mor1606767-196.html