BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
William King v George Seton of Barns. [1694] Mor 12247 (10 January 1694)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Mor2912247-003.html Cite as:
[1694] Mor 12247
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Halcraig reported William King against George Seton of Barns, for some reparations of a house. Barns alleged the decreet was truly in absence, seeing the procurator compearing had no mandate. Answered, His producing writs relative to the cause presumes a mandate. Replied, These writs were in his hands upon another account. The Lords found it sufficiently instructed that he was his ordinary procurator, and had a mandate in this cause.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 194. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 590.
