BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Tweeddale, Chancellor, v Dury of Craiglascar. [1695] 4 Brn 246 (18 January 1695) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1695/Brn040246-0557.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: The Earl of Tweeddale, Chancellor,
v.
Dury of Craiglascar
18 January 1695 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mersington reported the Earl of Tweeddale, Chancellor, against Dury of Craiglascar. The question was,—He, being a vassal of the regality of Dumfermline, if he was liable in the sheriff-fiars as the price of his teinds, or in the regality fiars, which are much dearer. The Chancellor founded on a decreet he had obtained against Fotheringham of Halhill. Answered,—This vassal, Craiglascar, is in another case; because he has a decreet of the Commission for
Plantations finding him only liable in the Exchequer prices. Alleged,—This was before Dumfermline got the tack. The Lords resolved to hear this farther.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting