BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Stuart, and his Tutor, v John Hill, Merchant, in Greenock, and Others. [1712] Mor 11039 (24 January 1712) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1712/Mor2611039-235.html Cite as: [1712] Mor 11039 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1712] Mor 11039
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VII. Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Effect of diligence during the seven years.
Date: George Stuart, and his Tutor,
v.
John Hill, Merchant, in Greenock, and Others
24 January 1712
Case No.No 235.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the action at the instance of George Stuart, and his Tutors, against John Hill and others, the Lords found, that executing a summons is not sufficient to found interruption of prescription, the summons having fallen and expired through not being tabled or called within year and day.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting