BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Jean Crawford, Relict of James Crawford, Son to the Laird of Ardmillan, v John Kennedy of Baltersan. [1713] Mor 11615 (10 July 1713) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1713/Mor2711615-282.html Cite as: [1713] Mor 11615 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1713] Mor 11615
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XI. Possession, how presumed, and what presumed from it.
Subject_3 SECT. I. Whether the Proprietor is presumed to have uplifted the Teinds.
Date: Jean Crawford, Relict of James Crawford, Son to the Laird of Ardmillan,
v.
John Kennedy of Baltersan
10 July 1713
Case No.No 282.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Jean Crawford having right by progress to some tacks set by the Bishop of Dumblain to the deceased Kennedy of Baltersan, of the teinds of his lands, pursued John Kennedy now of Baltersan, as heir to the defunct his father, for payment of 16 years tack-teind-duties; during which time, it was proved, that he the defunct was heritor of, and possessed the lands. The Lords found the defender liable for these teind-duties, albeit it was not proved that he was in the natural possession, or that he received a joint duty for stock and teind; in respect it is presumed, that he intromitted with the whole rents comprehending both stock and teind; seeing it is not alleged that any other person uplifted the teind.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting