BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Forbes v Dunbar, [1726] Mor 11014 (00 February 1726)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1726/Mor2611014-215.html Cite as:
[1726] Mor 11014
Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. II.
Who entitled to the benefit of the act 1695. - Can the benefit of it be renounced.
Forbes v. Dunbar,
1726.
February. Case No. No 215.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It was found, that action for relief competent to one cautioner against another, is not cut off by the septennial prescription, but runs the course of 40 years. See Appendix.
