BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1734] 1 Elchies 356 (26 July 1734) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1734/Elchies010356-004.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PROCESS.
A
v.
B
1734 ,July 26 .
Case No.No. 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a case reported by Lord Drummore in a process in the Outer-House roll, wherein the pursuer not compearing protestation was granted, the defender gave in an account of expenses, and the question was, Whether we could or should give such expenses by and attour the protestation money mentioned in the act 1672, being L.8, which is only payable in case the defender be pursued again. The Lords granted the expenses, though no precedent was offered of it since the institution of the College of Justice.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
