BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Neilson v Russel. [1734] Mor 12338 (14 February 1734)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1734/Mor2912338-116.html
Cite as: [1734] Mor 12338

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1734] Mor 12338      
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I.

Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III.

What Proof relevant to take away Writ.

Neilson
 v.
Russel

Date: 14 February 1734
Case No. No 116.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a competition betwixt an onerous indorsee to a bill and an arrester, it having been found relevant to prefer the arrester, that the bill was not completed by subscription of the drawer at the time of the arrestment, the same was found relevant to be proved prout de jure. See Appendix.

 Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 218.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1734/Mor2912338-116.html