BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Merchant Company of Edinburgh v Roo. [1737] 2 Elchies 97 (26 January 1737) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1737/Elchies020097-008.html Cite as: [1737] 2 Elchies 97 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1737] 2 Elchies 97
Subject_1 BURGH ROYAL.
Date: Merchant Company of Edinburgh
v.
Roo
26 January 1737
Case No.No. 8.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Merchants in Burgh cannot retail unfreemens goods as their own; and therefore the Dean of Guild of Edinburgh having sustained such a complaint, to infer the pains and penalties contained in the formula of the burgess oath; the Lords, upon a bill of advocation, refused to pass the bill, but remitted with instructions that the pursuer specially qualify the fact; 2do, that the proof be before answer; 3tio, that the defender be allowed procurators.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
