BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Murray v Cowan. [1737] Mor 4508 (19 January 1737)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1737/Mor1104508-061.html Cite as:
[1737] Mor 4508
Prescription, by the Law of which Country regulated.
Murray v. Cowan
Date: 19 January 1737 Case No. No 61.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a process for recovery of money lost at play, with the triple value, founded upon the British statute, 9th Queen Anne, the defence was, That the action being brought upon a penal statute, and for a penalty, was fallen by the lapse of a year, in terms of the English statute, 31mo Elizabeth, cap. 5, declaring that no action shall be sustained upon any penal statute made, or to be made, unless within one year of the offence. And it was pleaded, that as this is a sovereign law in England, it must regulate the said penal British statute, 9th Queen Anne, the same way as if the limitation were engrossed in the act. Answered, It is by no means the same; the action arising upon the British statute, is in its nature perpetual, because not limited by the act. The act of limitation, so far as its authority goes, will found a defence so as to take away the action, ope exceptionis only; but as the laws of England have no authority here, the said act of limitation cannot be founded upon to bar the action. The Lords repelled the defence. See Appendix.
