BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Ramsay of Wyliecleugh v Brounlie. [1738] Mor 5538 (1 December 1738)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1738/Mor1305538-099.html Cite as:
[1738] Mor 5538
Subject_1 HERITABLE and MOVEABLE. Subject_2 SECT. XVII.
Adjudication upon Moveable Bonds.
Ramsay of Wyliecleugh v. Brounlie
Date: 1 December 1738 Case No. No 99.
An apprising, and all annualrents due thereon, belong to the heir, and not to the executor.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found that an apprising, and whole sums therein contained without distinction between principal sum and annualrents, accumulate sum and annualrents thereof, or accessories thereto, do belong to the heir, and no part thereof to the executor, notwithstanding the appriser died within the legal.
The question arose upon the allegation of the reverser, That the apprising was extinguished by the possession of the appriser's heir within the legal; which depended upon this, Whether the bygone annualrents at the appriser's death belonged to his executors or to his heir? If to his executors, the apprising was extinguished by the heir's possession within the legal.
It had been a received notion, that the bygone anuualrents, at the appriser's death, fell to his executors, and there were several instances condescended on of confirmations of such bygones; and so much was the Court of that opinion, that, when this question was first stirted, the President, and he only, spoke of it as a doubtful point. But when the matter came to be more maturely considered, the Court came unanimously into the above decision, as great inconveniencies must have arisen from a contrary judgment, and occasion been given to many questions not dreamed of, concerning estates possessed upon apprisings.
So, upon examining the nature of an apprising, it was judged to be a proper sale under redemption, whereby the land which descends to the heir comes in place of the debt, which no more exists as to either principal or annualrents: whereas, were it a pignus prætorium or legal disposition in security during the legal (which had been the common notion) then the debt still subsisting till expiry of the legal, the appriser dying within the legal, the bygone annualrents of it would fall to his executors.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 269. Kilkerran, (Adjudication and Apprising.) No 3. p. 3.
