BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Rutherford v Haig. [1739] 1 Elchies 515 (6 June 1739) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Elchies010515-007.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 WRIT.
Rutherford
v.
Haig
1739 ,June 6 .
Case No.No. 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found that Mr Thomas Gordon's letter does not prove its date, unless it be instructed. We agreed that the general point depends upon circumstances, and has been variously decided, and that missive letters prove their dates in matters that are usually transacted by missive letters; but this one appeared very suspicious, that so great a claim as L.500 or L.600 sterling should lie so long uncleared upon such a writing.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting