BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Children of Sir David Murray, and Robert Gordon, Their Assignee v The Earl of March and the Creditors of Broughton. [1739] 2 Elchies 436 (20 June 1739)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Elchies020436-070.html
Cite as: [1739] 2 Elchies 436

[New search] [Help]


[1739] 2 Elchies 436      

Subject_1 PERSONAL AND REAL.

Children of Sir David Murray, and Robert Gordon, Their Assignee
.
v.
The Earl of March and the Creditors of Broughton

Date: 20 June 1739
Case No. No 2.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A Disposition to a son in his contract of marriage, dated 1710, “providing and declaring, and it shall be provided in the charters and infeftments to follow hereupon, that these presents are granted, and the lands, &c. are resigned with the express burden of payment of the whole debts and sums due by the father to his creditors, and contained in a particular list, as also with the burden of payment to the said Sir David Murray's children of the respective provisions granted by him to them, all particularly set down in the foresaid list, subscribed by the said Sir David and Alexander Murray, of the date of these presents;”—a list was accordingly duly made out of that date, referring to the contract, and registered in the Common Register of Session, anno 1717, and in 1715 the son was infeft, the sasine bearing in general, “under the burdens and provisions mentioned in the contract, and contained in the list,” and in 1719 the son sold the estate. The Lords found the childrens provisions, though contained in that list, were not real burdens, chiefly because the list of debt' and provisions was neither inserted in the disposition, nor registered in the Register of Sasines, but only in the books of Session. (See Dict. No. 70. p. 10,247).

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Elchies020436-070.html