BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> York-Buildings Company'S Tacksman, Bartlett, v Stewart. [1742] 1 Elchies 443 (1 December 1742) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1742/Elchies010443-007.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 TACK.
York-Buildings Company'S Tacksman, Bartlett,
v.
Stewart
1742 ,Dec. 1 .
Case No.No. 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
As to the general question, Whether horning is necessary against a tacksman not in the natural possession but possessing by sub-tenants? vide my notes on this case. But the question before us turned upon the communing betwixt Stewart and the York-Buildings Company, Whether that was sufficient intimation? The Lords adhered to the Odinarys interlocutor as to crop 1740, and found him only liable for the tack-duty of that crop, but found him liable for the whole rents 1741, though no intimation or warning was made to him before that term, which to me seemed odd. Arniston in the chair gave his opinion in terms of the interlocutor, but seemed afterwards to doubt upon the reasoning.—13th January 1743, Adhered.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
