BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mrs Kennedy v Mrs Jean Campbell. [1747] 1 Elchies 364 (19 June 1747) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Elchies010364-007.html Cite as: [1747] 1 Elchies 364 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1747] 1 Elchies 364
Subject_1 PROOF.
Mrs Kennedy
v.
Mrs Jean Campbell
1747 ,June 19 .
Case No.No. 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In this most extraordinary case of the deceased Carrick's two marriages, we all agreed that Mrs Campbell having without challenge lived 20 years with Carrick as man and wife, and even owned as such by Mrs Kennedy; that Mrs Campbell has all the civil rights of a lawful wife and her children of lawful children; therefore we altered Arniston's interior cutor, and remitted with an instruction to allow Mrs Kennedy no proof, renit. Arniston and President, because Mrs Kennedy might yet be prosecuted for adultery, and might suffer in her character which this might prevent; but reversed in Parliament 6th February 1749, and even given up by Mr Erskine Lady Carrick's counsel as untenable, as Mr Al. Ross her solicitor wrote. How different are the opinions of men in this mortal state!—28th July 1747.
In the case marked 28th July 1747, betwixt Mrs Jean Campbell, relict of Mr John Campbell of Mamore, and Mrs Magdalen Cochrane, relict of Kennedy, who pursued a declarator of her marriage with Captain Campbell of Carrick prior to Mrs Jean Campbell's marriage with him, Mrs Kennedy having appealed our judgment was of consent reversed 6th February 1749, and the Commissaries interlocutor allowing a proof before answer affirmed. That proof was accordingly brought on both sides, and the Commissaries found the defenders ouvert cohabitation with Carrick as man and wife from the beginning of 1726 till he went abroad in 1743 proven, and found the pursuer's prior marriage libelled not proven, dismissed her process, and found the facts proved by Mrs Jean Campbell relevant to infer marriage. The pursuer offered a bill of advocation, which with the answers was reported by Murkle, and the cause heard at the Bar two days, and we unanimously refused the bill. The President was not with us at advising, but was of opinion that the pursuer had not proved her marriage. She produced an acknowledgment of marriage holograph of Carrick dated 3d July 1724, but mentioned neither minister nor witnesses to the marriage, nor was the writing witnessed, but she brought a proof by two different witnesses but far from being unexceptionable of their having seen it before the time that the defender said she was married, viz. 9th December 1725, and also proved familiarities between them, such as Carrick's being secretly conveyed to her bed-chamber at midnight, and sometimes being with her all night. But there were many and violent presumptions against her.—19th June 1751.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting