BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Marquis of Annandale v Irving. [1748] Mor 15661 (4 December 1748) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1748/Mor3615661-064.html Cite as: [1748] Mor 15661 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1748] Mor 15661
Subject_1 TEINDS.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Nature and Effect of this Right.
Date: The Marquis of Annandale
v.
Irving
4 December 1748
Case No.No. 64.
Whether teinds are carried by a general grant of patronage cum decimis?
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a sale pursued before the Commission, by Irving of Bonshaw, of his teinds in the parish of Kirkpatrick-Fleming, against the Marquis of Annandale, as patron, the Marquis alleged he was not only patron, but also titular, and, as such, entitled to nine years purchase. The right he produced was a charter in the year 1663, of the patronage, in these words: “Una cum jure patronatûs ecclesiæ parochialis et parochiæ de Kirkpatrick-Fleming, et decimis tam rectoriis quam vicariis earundem.”
But as in all grants of patronage there is a clause una cum decimis, to give the patron a title to the administration of the teinds, and as to give a right to teinds a special grant is necessary, which are not understood to be carried by such a clause as this, giving them as an appendage of the patronage, the Lords found, “That the Marquis had only right to the teinds as patron, and as such was entitled only to six years purchase.”
In this same process, the patron having insisted, that, in respect of a depending augmentation, such part of the teinds of the pursuer's lands should be deducted from the sale as he might allocate in augmentation, so as he might free his own
lands, the Court thought the demand reasonable; but, as the quantum could not appear till the issue of the augmentation, they sisted farther procedure in the sale till the second Wednesday of June following.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting