BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ross v Steven. [1749] Mor 16935 (11 July 1749)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1749/Mor3816935-174.html
Cite as: [1749] Mor 16935

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1749] Mor 16935      

Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. VI.

Other Requisites.

Ross
v.
Steven

Date: 11 July 1749
Case No. No. 174.

Two deeds of different dates written on one piece of stamped paper, the first is good, the second null.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Where two tacks were written upon one sheet of stamp-paper, the first in date was sustained, though the second, upon which the party did not found, was not stamped.

Kilkerran, No. 17. p. 613. *** D. Falconer reports this case:

Ludovick Dunbar of Westfield granted to James Steven a tack of certain lands, which was duly written upon stamped paper; and after granted him a further tack of other lands, which was written on the same paper with the former.

On Westfield's death, Margaret Ross his relict, in virtue of her life-rent right over these lands, insisted in a reduction of both the tacks; for that by the stamp act, 12mo Annæ, it was provided, that when more than one matter or thing were ingrossed upon one sheet of paper, the duty should be payable for each of them: And when any matters or things were, contrary to the meaning of the act, written on any paper not duly stamped, the sum of £5 Sterling should be payable respectively for each of the said matters; until payment whereof the said matter should not be given in evidence, nor admitted in any Court: That these two tacks were written on paper not duly stamped, and consequently not probative till the sums respectively were paid for each of them.

Answered: The defender insists only on the tack first in date, which being written on stamped paper is good, and cannot be annulled by the after writing another on the same paper.

The Lords sustained the first tack.

Reporter, shewalton, Act. Lockhart & Brown. Alt. H. Home. Clerk, Pringle. D. Falconer, v. 2. No. 81. p. 88.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1749/Mor3816935-174.html