BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Johnston v Crawfurd and Others. [1751] 1 Elchies 496 (19 February 1751)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1751/Elchies010496-021.html
Cite as: [1751] 1 Elchies 496

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1751] 1 Elchies 496      

Subject_1 TUTOR - CURATOR - PUPIL.

Johnston
v.
Crawfurd and Others

1751, Feb. 19.
Case No. No. 21.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The deceased Johnston of Straiton, by a deed in liege poustie, appointed certain persons tutors and curators to his children, three to be a quorum, but his wife sine qua non. The words were, “with power to them, or any two of them, with the said mother, to exerce the officer.” He thereafter on death-bed made another nomination of tutors and curators, leaving out one of the first named, and adding other four, and made three a quorum, without any mention of the sine qua non, and with power to those first named to accept either on the first or last nomination. After the pupillarity was expired, the widow wanting to get free of these tutors and curators, renounced the office of curatory, and the eldest son raised an edict for chusing curators, which was opposed by those named, and advocated to this Court. The minor alleged that the first nomination was fallen by his mother's renunciation, and that the nomination on death-bed could not bar him from chusing curators. Answered: The nomination of a sine qua non does not determine or void the nomination; 2dly, that a nomination being once made in liege poustie, the father might effectually vary or qualify that nomination on death-bed. This last we did not much regard; and upon answers to the defenders' petition, we repelled both, and adhered to Minto's interlocutor; though several said they were chiefly moved by other matters in the answers, that the defenders had not taken any concern in the minor's affairs while pupil; but I confess I made no doubt that the first nomination was fallen.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1751/Elchies010496-021.html