BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Creditors of Sir George Hamilton, Competing, i. e. Blackwood of Pittreavie v Boyes and Others. [1752] 2 Elchies 284 (5 June 1752) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1752/Elchies020284-018.html Cite as: [1752] 2 Elchies 284 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1752] 2 Elchies 284
Subject_1 INHIBITION.
Date: Creditors of Sir George Hamilton, Competing, i e. Blackwood of Pittreavie
v.
Boyes and Others
5 June 1752
Case No.No. 18.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Two inhibitions, at the instance of different creditors, but against the same person, being executed the same day, but one of them supposing him
to be out of the country, the Lords sustained both inhibitions, referring to Mr Blackwood the competitor to disprove either the one or the other as he should be advised. 2do, Repelled the objection to the execution of an inhibition, that it did not recite the debt on which the inhibition proceeded, nor the date of the letters.
3tio, That though executed against the debtor as out of the country, yet it was executed against the lieges only at the market cross of Edinburgh, in which his ordinary residence was, agreeably to the judgment among Sir Alexander Murray's creditors. (No. 13.)
4to, Repelled also the objection, that the execution bore the leaving a copy of the letters, but not of the execution itself.
5to, Though the inhibitions were in 1698, found them not prescribed, because the infeftment on the deed quarrelled was in 1706, and in the 1735 the inhibiters were preferred to it on other grounds. Vide inter cosdem voce Jus Tertii. Vide No. 10. Vide Ranking and Sale.
See Mathieson against Carlyle, 1st February 1739, voce Bankrupt.
See Burton against Corse, 22d July 1747, voce Husband and Wife.
See Creditors of Whitehaugh, voce Competition.
See Dickie against Creditors of Anderson, 28th November 1734, voce Obligation.
See Notes.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting