BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Gloug v John Macintosh. [1753] Mor 11063 (3 July 1753)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1753/Mor2611063-256.html
Cite as: [1753] Mor 11063

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1753] Mor 11063      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION. VIII.

Quinquennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. III.

Stipends.

William Gloug
v.
John Macintosh

Date: 3 July 1753
Case No. No 256.

Vacant stipends fall under the quinquennial prescription.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Macintosh being pursued by Gloug for payment of certain vacant stipends, objected prescription by act 9th Sess. 1. parl. 2. Cha. II.

Answered for the pursuer; The act is a correcory law; it mentions ‘ ministers stipends’ only, and may not be extended to ‘ vacant stipends.’ The stipend's of ministers are an alimentary provision, and, by reason of their special privileges, may be speedily collected; they are therefore subjected to a short prescription. Vacant stipends resemble them in name only; they are not of an alimentary nature, have not the same privileges, nor are comprehended under the words of the stasute; to them therefore the quinquennial prescription does not extend.

Pleaded for the defender; The expression ‘ vacant stipends ’ is indeed improper; but our statutes are not framed with critical accuracy; and, since in act 52d Sess. 1. parl. 1. Cha. II. ‘ vacant stipends’ are termed ‘ the stipends of vacant kirks,’ they may well be comprehended under the denomination of ‘ the stipends of ministers.’ The quinquennial prescription was introduced for the benefit of the heritors liable in payment of stipends; vacant stipends, as well as ministers’ stipends, fall under the reason of the law; and the former ought to be subjected to the prescription as well as the latter.

“The Lords sustained the defence of prescription.”

Reporter, Lord Minto. Act. J. Craigic. Alt. Macintosh. Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 104. Fac. Col. No 77. p. 115.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1753/Mor2611063-256.html