BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir William Forbes v Drummond. [1772] 5 Brn 583 (00 January 1772) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1772/Brn050583-0680.html Cite as: [1772] 5 Brn 583 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1772] 5 Brn 583
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 SALE.
Sir William Forbes
v.
Drummond
1772 .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir William Forbes and Others, proprietors of certain areas in the New Town of Edinburgh, contracted with Drummond to build, for them, houses on said areas, at a determined price: the price to be paid in certain proportions, according as the building advanced. Drummond proceeded accordingly, and received payment seriatim; but his affairs having gone into disorder, the Lords found, that the materials of wood, which he had collected for carrying on the building, while they remained unfixed in the houses, were liable to be poinded
as Drummond's property; but, after being fixed in the houses, became a part of the houses, for which the furnishers had no claim upon the houses, but only an action against Drummond,—having furnished them upon his credit. The case had been different, had the right of the area been in Drummond: in that case, inedificatum solo cedit; so that the furnishers of the materials would have had a claim upon the houses, and not personally, only against Drummond. And so the Lords thought in a cause decided 24th July 1776, Brown against Johnstone.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting