BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Jean Stewart v Samuel M'Kean. [1774] 5 Brn 554 (00 January 1774) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1774/Brn050554-0626.html Cite as: [1774] 5 Brn 554 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1774] 5 Brn 554
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 PROOF.
Jean Stewart
v.
Samuel M'Kean
1774 .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Jean Stewart brought an action, before the Sheriff of Wigton, against Samuel M'Kean, for aliment of a bastard child, of which she was delivered, 3d January 1772. The defender denied that he was the father of the child; and the pursuer having referred to his oath, if he had not had criminal correspondence with her within twelve months prior to the birth of the child; and he having deponed that he had had such correspondence 11 calendar months preceding 3d January 1772, but no later, the Sheriff assoilyied, and decerned.
Winter Session 1774, in an advocation, the Lords advocated the cause, and assoilyied.
It seemed dangerous to extend the period of incubation of children, above that fixed by the law, in the question of legitimacy, where ten months is reckoned the highest; for though perhaps instances may be found, as was alleged in this case, where women have gone eleven months instead of nine, or ten, yet such instances, if such there be, are not to be made a rule. But Lord Covington observed, that he doubted if the periods fixed by law held as to bastard children, confessedly allowed to be such, but that they were fixed in favorem matrimonii. However, the Lords determined as above, and did not seem to regard this distinction.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting