BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Creditors of Belshier v His Apparent Heir. [1776] 5 Brn 561 (00 March 1776)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Brn050561-0640.html
Cite as: [1776] 5 Brn 561

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1776] 5 Brn 561      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 RANKING AND SALE.

The Creditors of Belshier
v.
His Apparent Heir

1776. March.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Creditors of Belshier of Grange raised a sale of his estate, on the Acts 1681 and 1690: his apparent heir did the same on the Act 1695. The summonses were raised, executed, called, and enrolled on the same day. It was needless to proceed in both: the question came, Which was to be preferred?

The Lords, on report of Lord Kennet, “allowed the apparent heir's process to proceed, preferably to the process at the instance of the creditors.”

The Lords thought the case of the apparent heir, and the privilege given him by statute, favourable, especially if there was a prospect of any reversion. They thought it a more advantageous and expeditious way to sell the estate first, and then to rank, which is the form in sales at the instance of apparent heirs, than to rank first, and then to sell, as in the case of sales by creditors: and one of the Lords wished that the form was made the same in both cases. Neither did it seem to weigh with their Lordships, that, in this case, in some of the constitutions the heir had renounced: He thought, that an heir renouncing to one creditor did not oblige him to renounce to all. And, at any rate, that his renouncing in processes of constitution did not divest him of the character of apparent heir, nor of this privilege among others. See Erskine, B. 3, tit. 8, § 57.

There did not appear to have been any decision on the point, viz. of a sale at the instance of an apparent heir after he had renounced. But it was said, this proceeded from the plea's not being tenable, otherways the objection must have been made, and repelled, long ago.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Brn050561-0640.html