BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Fotheringham v Langlands. [1776] Mor 1861 (13 December 1776) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Mor0501861-013.html Cite as: [1776] Mor 1861 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1776] Mor 1861
Subject_1 BURGH ROYAL.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Set of Burgh.
Date: Fotheringham
v.
Langlands
13 December 1776
Case No.No 13.
Found to be irregular, that the same person should be a member of different corporations.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Two burgesses of Brechin pursued a reduction of an election of the deacon and treasurer of the hammermen, and declarator that they themselves had been elected by a fair majority to those offices; and, in support of the plea, urged the immemorial usage of the burgh, by which the same person might be a member of different corporations; thus it was alleged, That a slater and butcher were members of the corporation of glovers; a weaver, a shoemaker, a wright, and a carter, were members of the corporation of bakers; and a writer was a member of the corporation of taylors; and it was urged, that unless this practice were allowed, some of the corporations would be extinct.——The Lords were of opinion, That the practice was most irregular, therefore repelled the reasons of reduction, and assoilzied from the declarator.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting