BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Buchannans v Gray and Hall. [1782] Mor 14350 (3 August 1782)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1782/Mor3314350-020.html
Sequestration refused, where real creditors are in possession, though their debts are under challenge.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Certain heritable subjects, which belonged to the deceased Robert Hall, had been possessed by Mr. Farquhar Gray and Miss Hall, by virtue of heritable securities granted by the proprietor.
Alexander and Jean Buchannans, adjudging creditors of the said Robert Hall, instituted a process of ranking and sale of his creditors and estate, and also a process of count and reckoning against the heritable creditors. In these actions, sundry objections were stated to the validity of the grounds of debt founded on by the heritable creditors. It was likewise maintained, that the debts, supposing them unexceptionable, had been extinguished by the creditors' intromission with the rents.
Matters being in this situation, they applied for a sequestration of the lands under sale. It was opposed by the heritable creditors; who
Pleaded: Whatever may be the result of the objections moved by the adjudging creditors to the debts upon which possession has been attained, it is evident, that these objections cannot be determined in the course of a summary application for sequestrating the lands; and that the debts at this period must be held as legal and subsisting. The present application is therefore improper in many respects. It would be unjust to deprive heritable creditors of the possession which they hold by the deed of the proprietor, and for the satisfaction of just debts. Such step is also unnecessary; because the heritable creditors, by entering into possession, have become answerable to all concerned for the proper management of the subjects. And it is moreover repugnant to practice, that sequestrators should be appointed to dispossess or disturb creditors who are in actual possession, and ready instantly to debate their rights.
“The Lords refused to sequestrate.”
For Buchannans, Arch. Campbell.For Gray and Hall, G. Fergusson.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 266. Fac. Coll. No. 61. p. 97.
