BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Davidson v Gregor Grant. [1786] Hailes 1001 (2 August 1786) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1786/Hailes021001-0671.html Cite as: [1786] Hailes 1001 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1786] Hailes 1001
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE, LORD HAILES.
Subject_2 PACTUM ILLICITUM.
Subject_3 A transaction between a Kirk-Session and a person guilty of Fornication, whereby the latter became bound to pay a sum of money to the Kirk-treasurer, legal.
Date: William Davidson
v.
Gregor Grant
2 August 1786 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
[Fac. Coll. IX. 447; Dict. 9571.]
Braxfield. The statute orders fines to be applied to pious uses within the parish. The kirk-session are the guardians of the poor: What should hinder them from taking a voluntary payment, instead of bringing an action?
Eskgrove. The statute makes no mention of kirk-session: they may be informers, and so may every individual. This business looks like a transaction for an offence.
President. The law has not expressly excluded a transaction of this nature, and there is great expediency in it. Besides, there has been an inveterate and universal practice, which is the best interpreter of the law.
Rockville. Such compositions afford a fund for the poor: they save people from shame, and they prevent the murder of bastard children.
Henderland. I cannot discover any authority in the statute for such transaction.
Eskgrove. Should it be thought that the suspender is bound to pay a bill which he has granted, I hope that the general question, as to the legality of such exactions, will remain entire.
On the 2d August 1786, “The Lords found the letters orderly proceeded;” altering the interlocutor of Lord Hailes, Ordinary.
Act. W. Miller. Alt. W. Honeyman. Diss. Eskgrove, Henderland, Stonefield, Hailes.
N. B.—I cannot satisfy myself as to this judgment. It appears to blend ecclesiastical law with civil, and to suppose that, in Scotland, the clergy and the officers of the church may, for money, dispense with discipline.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
