BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
George Ross, and Others, v Sarah Aglianby. [1793] Mor 582 (22 January 1793)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1793/Mor0200582-005.html Cite as:
[1793] Mor 582
Deeds of settlement containing a nomination of executors, having been reduced by the Court of Session, the nearest in kin may get themselves confirmed during the dependence of an appeal against the decree of reduction, to the effect of vesting a title in themselves from the date of the confirmation, in case the judgment should be affirmed.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
George Ross and Others applied to the Commissary of Dumfries to be decerned executors-dative, qua nearest in kin, to the late Richard Lowthian.
Sarah Aglianby, Mr Lowthian's widow, stated objections to the edict, founded on certain deeds, in which she was named his executor. These deeds, she admitted, had been reduced by the Court of Session; but she contended, that, as she had entered an appeal against their judgment, no person ought to be confirmed during its dependence.
The Commissary accordingly ‘delayed giving any decision in the edict till discussing of said appeal.’
The Lord Ordinary refused a bill of advocation complaining of this judgment.
The nearest in kin presented a reclaiming petition, stating, that as one of their number was 76 years of age, and in a valetudinary state of health, there was much reason to apprehend, that any delay of the confirmation might have the effect of altering the course of succession. And that, although the service of the writ of appeal must no doubt stop the execution of the decree of reduction, yet it could not restore the deeds reduced, which were in hoc statu to be considered as nonentities, and therefore they could not operate as a bar to the confirmation. 19th July 1710, Lyon and assignee against Lady Kinnaird, No 2. p. 580.; Wallace, 2d July 1774, Heron against Heron, voce Inhibition.
Observed on the Bench: The petitioners ought to be allowed to proceed in completing their titles, to the effect of vesting the right, and enabling them to transmit it to their own nearest in kin, if they should happen to die in the mean time.
The Court granted the prayer of the petition, for the purpose of vesting a title, upon the petitioners agreeing not to intromit till the appeal should be discussed.
Lord Ordinary, Dunsinnan.For the Petitioners, Geo. Fergusson.Clerk, Menzies. Davidson.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 31. Fac. Col. No. 14. p. 31.
