BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Gordon v The Earl of Fife and Others. [1793] Mor 14821 (27 February 1793) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1793/Mor3414821-034.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 STIPEND.
Date: John Gordon
v.
The Earl of Fife and Others
27 February 1793
Case No.No. 34.
When the teinds are valued in money, an augmentation cannot be modified in grain.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Reverend John Gordon, Minister of the parish of Strathdon, obtained, without opposition, an augmentation to his stipend, which was modified in grain.
The heritors, having afterwards discovered that almost the whose teinds were valued in money, in a reclaiming petition,
Pleaded: The Clergy were parties in the submission to Charles I. By his decreetarbitral, and by the various statutes made for enforcing it, it is declared, that valuations made under its authority, in which the Minister of the parish, and, in case of a vacancy, the Presbytery are necessarily defenders, shall never afterwards be called in question.
The teinds, in this case, have been valued in money; and to oblige the heritors
to pay them in grain, would be to alter both the nature and extent of their payment. Answered: Valuations in money are exceedingly unfavourable to the Minister, who, though nominally a party in the action, from the temporary nature of his right, seldom thinks it worth while to appear. The Court, however, will not suffer the interest of the benefice to suffer from his inattention; 30th November, 1791, Minister of Glenluce against the Earl of Galloway, (not reported; see Appendix).
Observed on the Bench: In later cases, the point has been settled in favour of the Heritors.
The Court altered the former interlocutor, and modified the stipend in money.
Act. W. Robertson. Alt. W. Murray.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting