BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
John Home, Writer to the Signet, Petitioner. [1793] Mor 16382 (7 March 1793)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1793/Mor3716382-310.html Cite as:
[1793] Mor 16382
The application of a curator bonis, for the sanction of the Court to ordinary acts of administration, is incompetent.
Borrowing money found to be an extraordinary act of management.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The late Sir Alexander Stirling executed a strict entail of the barony of Renton, and at the same time conveyed it to trustees for payment of an annuity to the widow and heir of the granter, and for a variety of other purposes; in particular, it was declared, that the trust should continue till the debts upon the estate were paid.
The trustees having declined accepting of the trust, John Home, writer to the signet, was appointed by the Court curator bonis upon the estate.
Some time after his nomination, he applied to the Court, 1st, For their authority to certain ordinary acts of administration, such as granting leases in terms of missives of the former proprietors, erecting buildings, and making improvements, &c. 2dly, He stated, that the rental of the lands was inadequate to the yearly charges against them, arising from the payment of the annuities, interest of debt, and the expense of management. He therefore craved to be allowed to borrow such sums of money upon the credit of the estate as should be necessary, in order to provide for the deficiency.
The Court considered both branches of the petition as falling within the ordinary powers of a curator bonis, and were of opinion, that it was not their province to superintend every common step taken respecting an estate under judicial management. They therefore refused the petition as incompetent.
Mr. Home presented a petition, reclaiming against this interlocutor, in so far as the Court had thereby refused to interpose their authority to his contracting debt. He stated, that Sir Alexander Stirling, by his deed of trust, had allowed his trustees to borrow money only to pay off the principal sums of the debts upon the estate, in case they should be demanded before they could be paid out of the rents and price of woods, and had not provided for other exigencies, such as the present, which might equally demand the borrowing of money to a certain limited extent, in order to carry on the management. That this act of administration was therefore of an extraordinary nature, though in the circumstances of the case absolutely necessary; and consequently the warrant for it must flow from the Court, both for the sake of getting the money more readily, and in order to render it an effectual burden on the lands.
The Court in so far altered their former interlocutor, and granted this prayer of the petition.
For the Petitioner, Rolland, Cha. Hope.Clerk, Home.
Fac. Coll. No. 46. p. 96.
*** On 19th January, 1803, a curator bonis applied for a warrant to borrow money. The petition was refused. See Henderson, Petitioner, No. 23. p. 14982. voce Summary Application.
