BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Robert Skirving and George Young v Robert Vernor. [1796] Mor 7930 (21 June 1796)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1796/Mor1907930-019.html Cite as:
[1796] Mor 7930
Suitable accommodation in that part of the area of the parish-church which belongs to the landlord, is held to be included in a lease of lands.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Robert Vernor, in 1763, obtained a lease of a farm belonging to the Earl of Wemyss, in the parish of Inveresk. His Lordship's factor, at the same time, wrote a letter to him, mentioning, that as he had agreed to repair and keep in good order his Lordship's property in the church during the lease, he was in return to be allowed to possess or subset the whole of it.
Vernor's lease expired, and was renewed in 1783; and he continued to possess and let out the Earl's seats in the church as formerly, but without any express authority from his landlord. In 1794, however, Robert Skirving and George Young, who hold large farms in the parish under the Earl, of leases commencing in 1792, which give them right to the lands, ‘with all liberties and freedoms belonging thereto,’ presented, with consent of their landlord, a petition to the Sheriff, praying that the area in the church belonging to the Earl might be divided among his tenants, according to the rents paid by each.
A plan was accordingly made out, and the Sheriff ordered the division to take place in terms of it.
In an advocation, Vernor, inter alia, disputed the title of the pursuers to insist in the division, as their leases gave them no express right to seats in the church; contending, that the area of the church is the property of the heritors, who may subset it at their pleasure, and that, accordingly, the Earl of Wemyss had exerted that right, by his grant to the defender, which must be considered as renewed with his lease of the lands.
The pursuers
Answered; The right of an heritor in the the area of the church is not personal to himself, but is inseparable from the possession of the lands, and common to himself his family and tenants; the pursuers, therefore, would have been entitled to make their present claim, although their leases had not expressly given all the freedoms and liberties connected with the lands, and even in opposition to the Earl of Wemyss; but the clause in the lease, and the consent of his Lordship, make their case the more favourable. Besides, Vernor's grant of the seats has not been renewed along with his lease of the lands.
The Lord Ordinary reported the cause on memorials.
The Lords remitted ‘to the Sheriff, to find, that the Earl of Wemyss's tenants in the parish of Inveresk are entitled to be accommodated with suitable seats in the parish-church of Inveresk, and to make a fair and equitable division of his Lordship's area in that church accordingly; and found Messrs Skirving and Young entitled to their expenses.’
Lord Reporter Methven.Act. Cullen.Alt. Corbet.Clerk, Sinclair.
Fac. Col. No 224. p. 524.
