BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Kincaid v Alexander Glen and Co., and William Glen. [1798] Mor 7536 (15 June 1798)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1798/Mor1807536-249.html
Cite as: [1798] Mor 7536

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1798] Mor 7536      

Subject_1 JURISDICTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VI.

Admiral Court.
Subject_3 SECT. IV.

Dispensation to hold courts during vacation.

George Kincaid
v.
Alexander Glen and Co, and William Glen.

Date: 15 June 1798
Case No. No 249.

A maritime cause cannot be removed by suspension from the High Court of Admiralty to the Court of Session, until a final decree has been pronounced.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

George Kincaid brought an action for freight before the High Court of Admiralty, against Alexander Glen and Company, and William Glen.

The Judge-Admiral pronounced an interlocutor, deciding certain branches of the cause, and allowing a proof as to the remaining points.

The defenders, conceiving that a proof at large should have been allowed, brought a reduction of this interlocutor, and at the same time complained of it by a bill of suspension.

The pursuer contended, That the cause not being exhausted by the interlocutor of the Judge-Admiral, these proceedings were irregular, being in reality of the nature of an advocation from the Court of Admiralty, which was specially prohibited in maritime causes by 1681, c. 16.

The Lord Ordinary “refused the bill, as incompetent.”

In a reclaiming petition, the defenders

Pleaded; The statute 1681 allows suspensions and reductions, not merely of decrees, but of “acts” of the Court of Admiralty. These last clearly comprehend every interlocutory order; and indeed it would be multiplying litigation very unnecessarily, to continue a cause before a judge, who has made a radical mistake at the entrance of it.

The Lords refused the petition, without answers.

Lord Ordinary, Meadowbank. For the Petitioners, George Fergusson. Clerk, Menzies. Fac. Col. No 83. p. 190.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1798/Mor1807536-249.html