BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Proudfoot v. Lecky [1866] ScotLR 1_117_1 (23 January 1866)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0117_1.html
Cite as: [1866] ScotLR 1_117_1, [1866] SLR 1_117_1

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 117

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Tuesday, Jan. 23. 1866.

1 SLR 117_1

Proudfoot

v.

Lecky.

Subject_1Reparation
Subject_2Relevancy.

Facts:

Issue to prove that a defender, took possession of property belonging to the pursuer, whom he had dismissed from his service, and which were in the defender's own premises, disallowed.

Headnote:

George Proudfoot, merchant in London, sued Francis Boyce Lecky, linen merchant in Glasgow, for damages for having wrongfully and illegally dismissed him from his service on 5th August 1864. He proposed an issue to try this question, which was not objected to. But he proposed another issue in these terms—“Whether, after the dismissal of the pursuer by the defender, the defender, by another acting on his instructions, wrongfully took possession of certain property belonging to or in the possession of the pursuer, then in the business premises of the defender in London—to his loss, injury, and damage?” Lord Barcaple reported this proposed issue, expressing a doubt as to whether the mere taking possession of the articles referred to was a relevant ground for a claim of damage, and the Court to-day unanimously disallowed it. The defender could not lock up his premises without taking possession of the pursuer's effects which were there.

Counsel:

Counsel for Pursuer— Mr Clark, and Mr A. Moncrieff. Agents— Messrs Wilson, Burn, & Gloag, W.S.

Counsel for Defender—The Lord Advocate and Mr Pattison. Agent— Mr R. P. Stevenson, S.S.C.

1866


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0117_1.html