BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Principal and Professors of United College of St Andrews v. Blyth and Others [1866] ScotLR 1_166 (16 February 1866)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0166.html
Cite as: [1866] ScotLR 1_166, [1866] SLR 1_166

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 166

Court of Session Inner House Second Division.

1 SLR 166

Principal and Professors of United College of St Andrews

v.

Blyth and Others.

Subject_1Property
Subject_2Title
Subject_3Possession
Subject_4Proof.
Facts:

Held (aff. Lord Kinloch) that pursuers, claiming that certain subjects were included in their title, had failed to prove possession of the subjects, so as to show that their title comprehended them—such

Page: 167

proof being necessary in order to explain the title.

Headnote:

This is an action of reduction, improbation, and declarator of non-entry in regard to certain lands and tenements in and around St Andrews, at the instance of the principal and professors of the United College v. William Blyth, founder in St Andrews, and others. The alleged title to these subjects is a charter by John Hepburn, prior of St Andrews, in 1512 which conveys various subjects specifically described, and amongst the rest, “Terras, tenementa, et annuos redditus infra scriptos, infra civitatem Sancti Andreae et glebam monasterii ejusdem—videlicit, totas et integras terras et tenementa de vinella vulgariter dicta Priouris Wynd, alias Burne Wynd, et infra vinellum ipsam et portam monasterii exteriorem.” It is within this specific description that the subjects described in the summons are alleged by the pursuer to fall. The pursuers chiefly rely upon the fact that in 1571 the College of St Leonard granted a feu-charter in these subjects in favour of Thomas Lentroun—in whose right one of the defenders is now said to stand—for payment of a feu-duty of 10s. Scots, which has been paid ever since. The Lord Ordinary (Kinloch) found that the pursuers had produced no title to the subjects in question; and to-day the Court, dealing with the case as a mere question of fact, adhered, on the ground that even assuming the pursuer's title to be adequate and habile to carry the subjects, they had not explained it by the proof of possession which they had led, so as to show that their title comprehended them.

Counsel:

Counsel for the Pursuers—The Solicitor-General and Mr Cook. Agents— Messrs W. & J. Cook, W.S.

Counsel for the Defenders— Mr Clark and Mr Hunter. Agents— Messrs Morton, Whitehead, & Greig, W.S.

1866


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0166.html