BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Petition - Morris [1866] ScotLR 3_84 (5 December 1866)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/03SLR0084.html
Cite as: [1866] SLR 3_84, [1866] ScotLR 3_84

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 84

Court of Session Inner House Second Division.

3 SLR 84

Petition—Morris

( ante, vol. ii., p. 222.)


Subject_1Appeal to House of Lords
Subject_2Interim Execution.

Facts:

A petition to apply a judgment of the House of Lords affirming one of this Court is incompetent; and one for delivery of a bond of caution to repeat expenses, ordered to be paid under an applications for interim executions is unnecessary, where the judgment is affirmed, because the bond is conditions on reversed only.

Headnote:

In this case the Court of Session had decerned in the petitioner's favour, with expenses, and an appeal having been taken to the House of Lords, had granted interim execution for expenses on the usual bond of caution for repetition being lodged. The House of Lords having simply affirmed the judgment, the petitioner in this petition asked the Court to apply the judgment of the House of Lords, and to grant warrant to the clerk for delivery of the bond of caution.

Orr Paterson appeared for the petitioner.

Alex. Blair for the respondent.

The Court, ex proprio motu, dismissed the petition as unnecessary, holding that where the House of Lords' judgment was a simple affirmance, it was neither necessary nor competent to apply the judgment, and there was no occasion for delivery of the bond of caution, because its coming into operation was conditional on reversal only.

Solicitors: Agents for Petitioner— Duncan & Dewar, W.S.

Agents for Respondent— Hunter, Blair & Cowan, W.S.

1866


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/03SLR0084.html