BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Chisholm v. Marshall [1874] ScotLR 11_206 (10 January 1874)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1874/11SLR0206.html
Cite as: [1874] SLR 11_206, [1874] ScotLR 11_206

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 206↓

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Saturday, January 10. 1874.

11 SLR 206

Chisholm

v.

Marshall.

Subject_1Court of Session Act 1868, § 70.
Headnote:

On this case being called no appearance was made for the respondent—

Asher, for the appellant, referred to the case of Stuart v. Stuart, 16th May 1871, 9 Macph. 740.

There being some doubt as to whether the appeal had been intimated to the respondent.—

Judgment:

Lord President—It is the practice of the Sheriff-Clerk of Lanarkshire to mark on the record not only that an appeal has been lodged, but also that it has been intimated in accordance with the Act, and I take this opportunity of saying, what I am sure your Lordships will concur with me in thinking, that it would be very advisable if all Sheriff-clerks would adopt the same course.

The Court appointed the appellant's agent to communicate with the Sheriff-clerk, and ascertain if appeal had been intimated; and continued the case for a week.

 1874

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1874/11SLR0206.html