BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ross v. Herde [1882] ScotLR 19_481 (9 March 1882) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1882/19SLR0481.html Cite as: [1882] ScotLR 19_481, [1882] SLR 19_481 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 481↓
[
A reclaiming note was refused as incompetent because it had been boxed on Monday instead of the previous Saturday, on which day the reclaiming days had expired, there being no consent by the respondent.
The reclaimer cited as authorities 6 Geo. IV. c. 120, sec. 18; Hume v. Macalister, 21st Feb. 1855, 27 Sc. Jur. 195, 17 D. 477; M'Call v. Laing & Wilson, 7th July 1868, 40 Sc. Jur. 569. The respondent replied that in the cases cited the note was received of consent—here there was none.
Counsel for Suspender and Respondent— Baxter. Agent— W. Lowson, Solicitor.
Counsel for Respondent and Reclaimer— J. A. Reid. Agent— D. H. Wilson, S.S.C.
