[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA237782013 [2014] UKAITUR IA237782013 (30 June 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA237782013.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA237782013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/23778/2013

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House	Determination Promulgated
On 19 June 2014	On 30 June 2014

 

 

Before

 

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SIMLER

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J F W PHILLIPS

 

Between

 

Mr Syed Hussain Shah

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

Representation:

 

For the Appellant: Mr R Claire, Counsel

For the Respondent: Mr P Duffy, Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

 

 

1.             In a determination promulgated on 31 March 2014 First-tier Tribunal Judge Mayall dismissed an appeal against refusal of long residence status in circumstances where the appellant had arrived illegally claiming long residence and the judge found that that was not made out and that no breach of Article 8 arose either.

2.             The application to appeal, albeit made out of time, was admitted and was allowed in circumstances where on the day of the hearing 27 February 2014 the appellant had arrived at the hearing centre but was taken ill and went to hospital. An application for an adjournment was made to the judge but in the absence of medical evidence the judge refused the application.

3.             The grounds of permission to appeal was made on 12 May 2014 and today Mr Duffy on behalf of the Secretary of State has realistically conceded that the appeal should be allowed and that the decision should be set aside on that basis.

4.             We consider that that is a concession that is correctly and realistically made and we are grateful to Mr Duffy in those circumstances. Accordingly we allow the appeal and set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in this case.

5.             We remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal for the appeal to be considered afresh and we direct that an interpreter should be available at that hearing because the appellant has never had the opportunity to give evidence and would need to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signed Date

 

 

Mrs Justice Simler