BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA327152013 [2014] UKAITUR IA327152013 (30 October 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA327152013.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA327152013 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-FH-NL-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/32715/2013
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
| Heard at Field House | Determination Promulgated |
| On 22nd October 2014 | On 30th October 2014 |
|
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J G MACDONALD
Between
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
md arafat hossain
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr S Whitwell, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr T Binaziz, Counsel instructed by JS Solicitors
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The Respondent is a national of Bangladesh whose application to refuse to grant the Appellant leave to remain under the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) points-based system was refused by the Secretary of State.
2. His subsequent appeal to Judge Devittie was allowed in respect of the Immigration Rules to the limited extent that the matter was remitted to the Respondent for a fresh decision.
3. Grounds of application were lodged and permission to appeal granted.
4. Mr Whitwell appeared on behalf of the Secretary of State and pointed out that documents referred to in the refusal letter which were said not to have been lodged were, in fact, before the Secretary of State.
5. In all the circumstances he requested permission to withdraw the appeal. Mr Binaziz was content to accept the position given that he could achieve no better outcome than that.
6. In the circumstances I permitted the Secretary of State’s application to be withdrawn. The effect of this is that the decision stands and the Secretary of State will reconsider the papers and make a fresh decision.
Decision
7. The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error on a point of law.
8. I do not set aside the decision.
Signed Date: 30th October 2014
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge J G Macdonald
