BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> VA162552013 [2014] UKAITUR VA162552013 (6 August 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/VA162552013.html
Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR VA162552013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


VA /16255 /2013

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

Determination Promulgated

On 5 August 2014

On 6th Aug 2014

 

 

 

 

Before

 


UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR

 

Between

 

 

ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER (ISTANBUL)

Appellant

and

 

YAGIZ BUYUKKAYA

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation:

 

For the Appellant: Mr Bramble

For the Respondent: Not represented

 

 

Notice of withdrawal

 

 

  1. This is the appeal of the Entry Clearance Officer but for convenience I will refer to the original appellant herein, a citizen of Turkey born on 14 August 2009, as the appellant herein.

 

  1. The appellant applied along with his parents to visit his uncle, the sponsor, on 11 June, 2013 this application was refused on 15 July, 2013. The refusal of the appellant's application was based on the view taken by the entry clearance officer about the appellant’s parents’ financial circumstances and intentions. Their applications were refused and accordingly the appellant’s application was refused.

 

  1. The appellant along with his parents appealed and their appeals came before First-tier Judge Balloch on 7 March 2014.

 

  1. The First-tier Judge allowed the appeal of the appellants and his parents under reference VA/16249/2013 and VA/16262/2013, resolving the factual issues in favour of the appellants. She allowed the appeal of the appellant in the light of fact that his appeal was dependent on the outcome of his father’s appeal.

 

  1. The Entry Clearance Officer did not appeal the decision in respect of the appellant’s parents, but argued that, as the sponsor was the appellant’s uncle, he did not enjoy a full right of appeal, relying on the Immigration Appeals (Family Visitor) Regulations 2014 (SI 1532 of 2012). The judge had not referred to human rights or race relations grounds (see section 84(1)(b) and (c) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act, 2002.)

 

  1. Mr Bramble informed me that the Entry Clearance Officer had in fact granted the appellant a visa on 11th April 2014. There is moreover a letter from the sponsor dated 12 July 2014 stating that the appellant and his parents had visited and returned to Turkey.

 

  1. Mr Bramble in the circumstances withdrew the appeal.

 

Appeal withdrawn

 

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Warr

5 August 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/VA162552013.html