BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA139802014 [2015] UKAITUR IA139802014 (15 May 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA139802014.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA139802014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-AH- KEW-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/13980/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 1 st May 2015 |
On 15 th May 2015 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE M A HALL
Between
LOVELY BEGUM
(ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr I Khan of Universal Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr C Avery, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
1. The Appellant was granted permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Napthine promulgated on 7 th November 2014, who dismissed her appeal against the Respondent’s decision dated 6 th March 2014, to refuse to vary leave and remove the Appellant from the United Kingdom.
2. At a hearing on 25 th February 2015 the decision of the First-tier Tribunal was set aside as I found an error of law in that Article 8 of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights had been raised as a Ground of Appeal but no findings had been made in relation to Article 8. The hearing had been adjourned so that the decision could be re-made in relation to Article 8.
3. Mr Khan indicated that the Appellant now wished to withdraw her appeal. Rule 17(2) of The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 states that a notice of withdrawal will not take effect unless the Upper Tribunal consents to the withdrawal. Mr Avery had no comment to make on the withdrawal application.
4. I therefore agreed to the withdrawal of the appeal. There is consequently no appeal before the Upper Tribunal. The Respondent’s decision dated 6 th March 2014 to refuse to vary leave to remain and to remove the Appellant from the United Kingdom therefore stands.
No anonymity order is made.
Signed Date 1 st May 2015
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge M A Hall