BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA034322016 [2018] UKAITUR EA034322016 (23 February 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA034322016.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA034322016, [2018] UKAITUR EA34322016 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/03432/2016
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 26 January 2018 |
On 23 February 2018 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN
Between
Mr Mayooran Karunakaran
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Ms R Popal, Counsel, instructed by Amirthan & Suresh Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant is a citizen of Sri Lanka born on 27 November 1983 whose application for a residence card as an extended family member of an EEA national exercising treaty rights was refused on 3 March 2016. The appellant's subsequent appeal to the First-tier Tribunal was heard by Judge McCarthy.
2. In a decision promulgated on 8 February 2017 the judge, applying the Upper Tribunal decision in Sala (EFMs) [2016] UKUT 411, dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
3. Before me both parties were in agreement that in light of the recent Court of Appeal decision Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 1755 it was an error of law to find that there was no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. I agree.
4. As no findings were made by the First-tier Tribunal on the substantive issues the matter will need to be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh.
Notice of Decision
(1) The decision of the First-tier Tribunal contains a material error of law and is set aside.
(2) The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard before a judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge McCarthy.
(3) No anonymity direction is made.
Signed
|
|
|
| |||
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan |
|
|
Dated: 19 February 2018 |