BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA064882017 [2019] UKAITUR PA064882017 (5 November 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA064882017.html Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR PA64882017, [2019] UKAITUR PA064882017 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/06488/2017
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 31 October 2019 |
On 5 November 2019 |
|
|
Before
upper tribunal judge coker
upper tribunal judge sheridan
Between
EG
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr Mukherjee, instructed by Davjunnel Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr Walker, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
CONSENT ORDER
1. Pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 and by the consent of the parties the following order is made:
a. Upon the decision of the First-tier Tribunal having been set aside by a decision of Upper Tribunal Judge Coker promulgated on 3 May 2019;
b. And upon Mr Walker conceding that the appellant's protection claim should be allowed;
c. The appellant's appeal against the decision of the respondent dated 21 June 2017 to refuse her protection claim is allowed.
Direction Regarding Anonymity - Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
Unless and until a Tribunal or court directs otherwise, the appellant is granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify him or any member of his family. This direction applies both to the appellant and to the respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
Signed
|
| |||
Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan |
Dated: 31 October 2019 |