United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments

Asylum and Immigration tribunal-b&w-tiff

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal number: PA/09270/2019 (P)

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Decided under rule 34	Decision and Reasons Promulgated
	On 13 July 2020

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

Between

 

K A M C

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.              This is an appeal against the decision of FtT Judge Tully, promulgated on 11 February 2020.

2.              The grounds are:

[1] failure to address the evidence of the appellant's partner;

[2] error of fact, taking it as the appellant's evidence that he took no precautions, when he did describe precautions taken; and

[3] error in identifying discrepancies arising from interviews.

3.              The FtT granted permission principally in light of ground [1], but without restriction.

4.              The UT issued directions with a view to deciding without a hearing whether the FtT erred in law and, if so, whether its decision should be set aside. In response, the appellant argues for the decision to be set aside, and seeks a remit. The SSHD "... agrees that the FtT materially erred in failing to engage with the evidence of the appellant's partner", and seeks the same outcome.

5.              I am satisfied that parties are correct in their agreement on ground [1]. It is unnecessary to resolve grounds [2] and [3], or to deal with the appellant's submissions on whether the UT should hold an oral hearing.

6.              The decision of the FtT is set aside. It stands only as a record of what was said at the hearing.

7.              U nder section 12 of the 2007 Act, and under Practice Statement 7.2, the case is remitted to the FtT for an entirely fresh hearing. The member(s) chosen to hear the case are not to include Judge Tully.

8.              The FtT's anonymity direction is preserved.

9.              The date of this determination is to be taken as the date it is issued to parties.

 

 

Hugh Macleman Date 29/06/2020

 

UT Judge Macleman

 

NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL RIGHTS

1. A person seeking permission to appeal against this decision must make a written application to the Upper Tribunal. Any such application must be received by the Upper Tribunal within the appropriate period after this decision was sent to the person making the application. The appropriate period varies, as follows, according to the location of the individual and the way in which the Upper Tribunal's decision was sent:

2. Where the person who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal is in the United Kingdom at the time that the application for permission to appeal is made, and is not in detention under the Immigration Acts, the appropriate period is 12 working days (10 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).

3. Where the person making the application is in detention under the Immigration Acts , the appropriate period is 7 working days (5 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).

4. Where the person who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal is outside the United Kingdom at the time that the application for permission to appeal is made, the appropriate period is 38 days (10 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).

5. A "working day" means any day except a Saturday or a Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday or a bank holiday.

6. The date when the decision is "sent' is that appearing on the covering letter or covering email.