BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Daisy Chain Nursery v Walsh [1996] UKEAT 1336_95_0105 (1 May 1996) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/1336_95_0105.html Cite as: [1996] UKEAT 1336_95_105, [1996] UKEAT 1336_95_0105 |
||
[New search] [Help]
At the Tribunal
HIS HONOUR JUDGE B HARGROVE Q.C.
PROFESSOR P D WICKENS OBE
MR N D WILLIS
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING - EX PARTE
Revised
APPEARANCES
For the Appellants MR M GRIFFITHS
(E.L.A.A.S.)
JUDGE HARGROVE Q.C.: The Industrial Tribunal held that the respondent was unfairly dismissed.
I need not go into the details. There was a transfer of undertakings. The position appears to be, and upon the findings the appellants were deceived by the second respondents. The basis being that the appellants had no knowledge of the dismissal because of deception of the second respondents, and that the dismissal did not relate to the transfer of undertakings.
The point is taken this morning that the calculation of the compensatory award should have taken into account Section 74. If one reads the whole of the reasons, it is quite obvious that all material matters were looked at, and although the wording of Section 74 was not used, we can see no arguable point of law in this case. Accordingly it is dismissed.
