BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Tele v Path (Local Authorities) Ltd & Anor [1998] UKEAT 119_98_2003 (20 March 1998) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/119_98_2003.html Cite as: [1998] UKEAT 119_98_2003 |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
| At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE N BUTTER QC
MR P R A JACQUES CBE
MR R N STRAKER
| APPELLANT | |
(2) LONDON BOROUGH OF NEWHAM |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
| For the Appellant | MR LEWIS (of Counsel) Appearing under the Employment Law Appeal Advice Scheme |
JUDGE BUTTER QC: We are grateful to Mr Lewis in this case, who in our view has correctly identified an arguable point of law, namely that in the light of the Davidson case and the Seymore-Smith cases, the Tribunal below ought arguably to have agreed for the matter to be reinstated and the application arguably should not have been dismissed as it was.
In the circumstances we propose to direct that the matter do proceed to a full hearing and we give leave for the Appellant to amend the Notice of Appeal within 14 days of today. the appeal itself will have to follow the normal procedure of this Tribunal in relation to the Seymore-Smith line of cases.
We will further direct that the skeleton arguments be exchanged 14 days before the date of the hearing of the appeal, whenever that might be.
