BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Thorne & Anor v. Riverside Centre Ltd [1999] UKEAT 1017_99_2311 (23 November 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/1017_99_2311.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 1017_99_2311

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 1017_99_2311
Appeal No. EAT/1017/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 23 November 1999

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D PUGSLEY

LORD DAVIES OF COITY CBE

MR J R RIVERS



MR M THORNE &
MISS L ROLFE
APPELLANT

THE RIVERSIDE CENTRE LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants NO APPEARANCE BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS
       


     

    JUDGE PUGSLEY:

  1. This is a case in which the Tribunal received notice from the Employment Law Centre Ltd that they will not be attending and rely on written submissions. One matter, concerns us, it is asserted in the ground of appeal: -
  2. The Chairman did not allow either representative of the relevant parties to address the Tribunal panel on remedies. In all Tribunals we have attended we have never before witnessed a Tribunal Panel reach a decision regarding quantum without first hearing representations from the relevant parties".

  3. Before this appeal is even considered we are of the unanimous view that the Chairman ought to comment on the suggestion that he did not allow either representatives of the relevant parties to address the panel on remedies. We have to say that this ought to take place before any other aspect of the matter is considered.
  4. The case should be relisted once comments of the Chairman have been received.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/1017_99_2311.html