BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Humphreys v Environment Agency [1999] UKEAT 24_99_1404 (14 April 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/24_99_1404.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 24_99_1404

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 24_99_1404
Appeal No. EAT/24/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 14 April 1999

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK

MISS A MACKIE OBE

MS B SWITZER



MISS A HUMPHREYS APPELLANT

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant Mr Wilson
    (of Counsel)
    Appearing under the
    Employment Law
    Appeal Advice Scheme
       


     

    JUDGE PETER CLARK: This is an appeal by the Applicant before the Cardiff Employment Tribunal, Miss Humphreys, against that Tribunal's decision promulgated with extended reasons on 3rd November 1988, dismissing her complaint of disability discrimination against her former employer, the Environment Agency.

    The Notice of Appeal in this case was settled by solicitors Leo Abse & Cohen, who did not appear below. Subsequently, the Appellant has lodged with this Tribunal, a Form of Amendment to the Notice of Appeal which raises matters which the Respondents say were not raised below. That difficulty has been overcome because, today, Mr Wilson represents the Appellant under the ELAAS pro-bono scheme and expressly, on instructions, abandons the grounds set out in the Amended Notice of Appeal and relies solely on the grounds set out in the original Notice of Appeal. Accordingly, we shall not grant leave to amend the Notice of Appeal.

    Having heard submissions in support of those grounds, we are satisfied that there is an arguable case to go forward to a full Appeal Hearing, based on the contention that the Employment Tribunal failed to follow the steps recommended by Mr Justice Bell in the decision in Morse -v- Wiltshire County Council [1998] ICR 1023. Accordingly, the matter will proceed on the basis of the original grounds of appeal to a hearing which should be listed for 1 day, Category A. There will be exchange of skeleton arguments between the parties, not less than 14 days before the date fixed for the full Appeal Hearing. Copies of those skeleton arguments to be lodged with this Tribunal at the same time.

    Finally, we make this observation in case it is of assistance to the relevant authorities. The disability discrimination cases remain in their infancy. They raise difficult questions of law before this Tribunal. That is a matter which we hope will be taken into account by the Legal Aid Committee in the event that Miss Humphreys is eligible for and applies for Legal Aid in connection with the further conduct of this appeal.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/24_99_1404.html