BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Pinnington v. Ysgol Crug Glas School & Anor [2001] UKEAT 1500_00_0204 (2 April 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1500_00_0204.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1500_00_0204, [2001] UKEAT 1500__204

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 1500_00_0204
Appeal No. EAT/1500/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 2 April 2001

Before

MR RECORDER LANGSTAFF QC

MR J HOUGHAM CBE

MR P R A JACQUES CBE



MRS B PINNINGTON APPELLANT

1) THE GOVERNING BODY YSGOL CRUG GLAS SCHOOL
2) CITY & COUNTY OF SWANSEA
RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant PATRICK GREEN
    (of Counsel)
    Mrs J Watson
    Bramble House
    Hook
    Nr Goole
    North Humberside
    DN14 5NE
       


     

    MR RECORDER LANGSTAFF QC

  1. We have before us a Preliminary Hearing in a proposed appeal by Mrs Pinnington against the Governing Body of her former school in Wales, and the City and County of Swansea, who were the local education authority.
  2. It is sufficient to say that without expressing any view as to the ultimate chances of success, we have formed the view that there is a properly arguable appeal on the grounds set out at paragraphs 6(a)–(h) in an amended Notice of Appeal which Mr Green has presented to us this morning. We should note that Mr Green appears here, pro bono, instructed by the bar pro bono unit and the work that he has done is testament to the quality of the representation and thought that they produce. We thank him for it.
  3. It is not necessary to say anything further, save that, the hearing will, we think, take no more than ½ a day, category C for listing purposes. Skeleton arguments 14 days in advance of the hearing together with 3 copies of any authorities to be relied upon.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1500_00_0204.html